Notices
C6 Corvette ZR1 & Z06 General info about GM’s Corvette Supercar, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

[Z06] Katech Torquer LS7 110 vs 116

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2011, 02:48 PM
  #21  
BigMike NY
Burning Brakes
 
BigMike NY's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2001
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Hi Jason,

I am getting ready to start modifying my BONE stock '08 Z. The initial mods forthcoming are as follows: American Racing Headers w/ x-pipe and hi-flow cats through factory exhaust, Halltech CF112 & beehive, 160* thermostat and of course a custom tune. Which one of your Katech cams would you recommend?

What kind of power can I expect with the above listed mods, cam included?

Thank you
Mike
Old 07-03-2011, 02:55 PM
  #22  
RGT
Drifting
 
RGT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,337
Received 67 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mopar Jimmy
WOW, the Torquer 110 made considerably more HP and TQ throughout the entire RPM band. If I had to choose right now Torquer 110 all the ay baby!
Old 07-03-2011, 10:07 PM
  #23  
Halltech
Supporting Vendor
 
Halltech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Bristol, Tennessee
Posts: 12,986
Received 582 Likes on 312 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09

Default

Originally Posted by Katech_Jason
Yes



~530



1. Interesting idea

2. We did that. It traded ~5hp for 5tq




13:1 compression
E85
FAST manifold
102mm throttle body



I haven't driven the car yet, but idle/drivability should be very good. Jim Hall loves his.

I tried to pick two of the most idential engines for this comparison. Both Street Attack LS7s without ported heads, FAST manifolds, or bigger throttle bodies.
I was not looking for the highest HP number, but rather a super street manners. The 110 is just about right for most guys and would have put us well over 600 RWHP.

Our car works on the power/weight ratio goal, which we have a 4.2lbs/hp and insane torque. That is a better ratio than the Bugatti Veyron.
__________________

"World Class Performance for your Corvette"
Intake Design and Engineering since 1999
Halltech Systems, LLC
262-510-7600

For service email:
orders@halltechsystems.com

www.halltechsystems.com

















Old 07-04-2011, 01:08 AM
  #24  
40YRW8
Drifting
 
40YRW8's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Oro Valley Arizona
Posts: 1,869
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Jason,
A couple of guys asked about the dip in the torque curve. Do you think that the FAST LSX-R manifold with the longer runners might smooth this out a little or possibly eliminate it? From what I have seen on dyno runs with the FAST, that seems to be about where it has an advantage over the stock manifold. Have you tried one with the FAST manifold?
Gary
Old 07-04-2011, 10:07 AM
  #25  
Vito.A
Melting Slicks
 
Vito.A's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 3,222
Received 84 Likes on 60 Posts

Default

It would also be interesting to see the HP/TQ curves for 1000-3000rpm since that is where the engine operates 90% of the time on the street.
Old 07-04-2011, 02:24 PM
  #26  
Michael_D
Safety Car
 
Michael_D's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,478
Received 361 Likes on 270 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vito.A
It would also be interesting to see the HP/TQ curves for 1000-3000rpm since that is where the engine operates 90% of the time on the street.
I agree. Dyno sheets that do not show this part of the curve are not telling the whole story.
Old 07-04-2011, 05:01 PM
  #27  
Z06Ronald
Melting Slicks
 
Z06Ronald's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Smallingerland Friesland, Netherlands
Posts: 3,421
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Katech_Jason
It would make more due to dyno headers, aftermarket calibration and J607 vs J1349 correction factors.
At the risk of being dumb ... what do these correction factors mean?
Old 07-04-2011, 06:01 PM
  #28  
kingpinfarr
Instructor
 
kingpinfarr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've had the Torquer 110 since April, 2k miles. It rocks. Nearly zero compromise in driveability. Running 25-deg advance at idle, it's difficult to tell whether or not the vehicle is bone stock (from idle quality). Pulls hard off the line, but there's a noticeable seat-of-the-pants increase in torque around 4k-rpm. Revs to the sky smooth and quick. For NA applications, no doubt I'd take the 110 everytime.

Only complaint: I think it should be in the $380-$430 range like every other LS7 cam, especially considering it's manufactured by CompCams. Wasn't enough of a complaint to keep me from buying it though.
Old 07-05-2011, 10:57 AM
  #29  
Katech_Zach
Premium Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Katech_Zach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Clinton Township MI
Posts: 13,988
Received 966 Likes on 528 Posts
C7 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Michael_D
Jason,

Have you done any further testing / comparisons with these two cams?

What do you think is happening to cause the dip in torque between 3200 and 4400 with the 110 grind? It's still there with the 116, but not as severe.

Did you try advancing / retarding the 116? I'm assuming the posted dyno run is with it straight up?
Just this test. The dip in the torque curve is normal for LS engines and has to do with runner tuning although it is also affected by camshaft as you see here.

We did not sweep test the cam. Often times its installed straight up, but in this test engine for whatever reason it was installed at 110.

Originally Posted by BigMike NY
Hi Jason,

I am getting ready to start modifying my BONE stock '08 Z. The initial mods forthcoming are as follows: American Racing Headers w/ x-pipe and hi-flow cats through factory exhaust, Halltech CF112 & beehive, 160* thermostat and of course a custom tune. Which one of your Katech cams would you recommend?

What kind of power can I expect with the above listed mods, cam included?

Thank you
Mike
Normally we go with the Torquer LS7 110 as it suits 95% of the customers looking to do a cam. By most people's standards for doing a camshaft it's mild, but the 116 is even milder still. The 110 will put you at about 600-610bhp with proper intake and exhaust, the 116 at about 585.

Originally Posted by 40YRW8
Jason,
A couple of guys asked about the dip in the torque curve. Do you think that the FAST LSX-R manifold with the longer runners might smooth this out a little or possibly eliminate it? From what I have seen on dyno runs with the FAST, that seems to be about where it has an advantage over the stock manifold. Have you tried one with the FAST manifold?
Gary
Here is our LSXR A-B test. It looks like direct torque curve shift. No changes to the dip.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...t-results.html

Originally Posted by Z06Ronald
At the risk of being dumb ... what do these correction factors mean?
Just real quick and simple...The dyno is correcting the horsepower for weather conditions so no matter what the conditions of the day are, we can duplicate the performance from day to day. The baseline for this correction factor is different between the two correction factors.
J607- 60°F, 0% humidity, 29.92 in-Hg baro
J1349 - 77°F, 0% humidity, 29.234 in-Hg baro.
Old 07-05-2011, 12:37 PM
  #30  
JOHN*99*
Advanced
 
JOHN*99*'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Fairfax Virginia
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Which injectors were used?

Do the tests with the Fast LSXR use the the stock LS7 fuel injectors with the OEM style fuel rail with spacers? I have some concern that spacers will effect the fuel spray pattern since the tips are raised in the port.
Old 07-05-2011, 12:44 PM
  #31  
Katech_Zach
Premium Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Katech_Zach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Clinton Township MI
Posts: 13,988
Received 966 Likes on 528 Posts
C7 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by JOHN*99*
Do the tests with the Fast LSXR use the the stock LS7 fuel injectors with the OEM style fuel rail with spacers? I have some concern that spacers will effect the fuel spray pattern since the tips are raised in the port.
Yes, they did.
__________________

Contact:
(e) zach@katechengines.com
Old 07-05-2011, 12:53 PM
  #32  
u1arunit
Melting Slicks
 
u1arunit's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,133
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Katech_Jason
Yes, they did.
So Jason, have you not found the spacers to be a problem with the injector spray pattern?
Old 07-05-2011, 01:12 PM
  #33  
Katech_Zach
Premium Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Katech_Zach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Clinton Township MI
Posts: 13,988
Received 966 Likes on 528 Posts
C7 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by u1arunit
So Jason, have you not found the spacers to be a problem with the injector spray pattern?
Correct - no problem
Old 11-15-2021, 05:38 AM
  #34  
oakaro68
2nd Gear
 
oakaro68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2021
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can someone please re post the original picture of the Dyno chart? For some reason I cannot see it.
Old 11-15-2021, 06:36 AM
  #35  
niphilli2
Drifting
 
niphilli2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,461
Received 145 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oakaro68
Can someone please re post the original picture of the Dyno chart? For some reason I cannot see it.

I PMed Zach about this about six months ago.

TTT for you
Old 11-15-2021, 07:48 AM
  #36  
Katech_Mike
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Katech_Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Posts: 107
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

I've attached an engine dyno comparison of the Torquer 110 vs Torquer 116 vs K501


The following users liked this post:
Blizzard1975 (11-15-2021)
Old 11-15-2021, 08:02 AM
  #37  
furious427
Drifting
 
furious427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2016
Location: Weeki Wachee Florida
Posts: 1,771
Received 436 Likes on 310 Posts
Default

Man that 110 makes more everywhere, I just wish it didnt have 12 degrees of overlap or id try it.

Get notified of new replies

To Katech Torquer LS7 110 vs 116

Old 11-15-2021, 08:45 AM
  #38  
oakaro68
2nd Gear
 
oakaro68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2021
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by furious465
Man that 110 makes more everywhere, I just wish it didnt have 12 degrees of overlap or id try it.
What makes you hesitant about the overlap, idle quality?
Old 11-15-2021, 11:02 AM
  #39  
grinder11
Race Director
 
grinder11's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,411
Received 3,606 Likes on 2,556 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by furious465
Man that 110 makes more everywhere, I just wish it didnt have 12 degrees of overlap or id try it.
You'll have no problem with idle quality. I'm running 17 degrees overlap, and it idles fine@800rpm, and fine@800rpm with the A/C on. In fact, I want just a bit more lope at idle, so when I've got a few extra $$, I'm gonna have the tuner try lowering the idle to 600-700rpm. We'll see. I'm running a Futral cam, ground by Cammotion. 232°/250° .603"/.608" lift, on a 112 LSA. Maybe the lower lift helps the idle quality, idk. Hope this helps......

Last edited by grinder11; 11-15-2021 at 11:09 AM.
Old 11-15-2021, 12:10 PM
  #40  
K-TownMike
Melting Slicks
 
K-TownMike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Kitchener Ontario
Posts: 2,172
Received 731 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by furious465
Man that 110 makes more everywhere, I just wish it didnt have 12 degrees of overlap or id try it.
I think you should go for it and let me know how it works out for you


Quick Reply: [Z06] Katech Torquer LS7 110 vs 116



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 AM.